Insurance Law

No apportionable claim and a costs order – a double blow for a professional indemnity insurer

02 June 2015

By: Mark Brookes and Katherine Hayes

The High Court’s recent decision in Selig v Wealthsure Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 18 carries a warning for both financial service providers and their professional indemnity insurers.

To read the full article click here or visit www.carternewell.com

< Back

OFFICES

Suite 300 - 1055 West Hastings St.
Vancouver, B.C., Canada, V6E 2E9

360 Central Avenue, Suite 845
St. Petersburg, Florida, USA 33701

STAY CONNECTED

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.

Ok Decline

Location/Industry

Law

Accounting

Strategic Partners

Insurance Law

No apportionable claim and a costs order – a double blow for a professional indemnity insurer

Carter Newell

OFFICES

STAY CONNECTED